Skip to content

Managing Agents in Singapore

Every MCST managing agent on the BCA register, compared on portfolio size and Google rating.

152 managing agents
#
Firm
MCSTs
Rating
1
183 6.3%
★ 3.5 158 reviews
2
Central · 5 zones · Est. 1980
169 5.8%
★ 2.3 65 reviews
3
East · 5 zones
147 5.0%
★ 4.2 257 reviews
4
129 4.4%
★ 4.6 768 reviews
5
116 4.0%
★ 2.1 61 reviews
6
Central · 5 zones
101 3.5%
★ 2.3 51 reviews
7
82 2.8%
★ 4.1 87 reviews
8
East · 5 zones
83 2.8%
★ 5.0 7 reviews
9
East · 4 zones · Est. 1996
65 2.2%
★ 2.1 30 reviews
10
67 2.3%
★ 2.6 24 reviews
11
52 1.8%
★ 2.6 16 reviews
12
East · 4 zones · Est. 2006
50 1.7%
13
Central · 5 zones · Est. 2008
38 1.3%
★ 4.3 98 reviews
14
Central · 5 zones · Est. 1995
36 1.2%
★ 4.8 1745 reviews
15
42 1.4%
★ 4.6 43 reviews
16
East · 4 zones · Est. 2008
38 1.3%
★ 5.0 1 reviews
17
Central · 4 zones
45 1.5%
★ 2.8 32 reviews
18
East · 5 zones · Est. 1985
42 1.4%
19
Central · 4 zones · Est. 1994
32 1.1%
★ 4.3 174 reviews
20
41 1.4%
★ 5.0 1 reviews
21
44 1.5%
★ 2.2 6 reviews
22
Central · 4 zones · Est. 1993
33 1.1%
★ 3.9 116 reviews
23
Central · 5 zones · Est. 2012
35 1.2%
★ 1.7 3 reviews
24
39 1.3%
★ 1.0 1 reviews
25
32 1.1%
★ 1.0 2 reviews
26
East · 4 zones · Est. 2015
21 0.7%
★ 4.2 84 reviews
27
28 1.0%
★ 2.3 15 reviews
28
East · 3 zones · Est. 2013
30 1.0%
29
Central · 5 zones · Est. 1994
25 0.9%
★ 3.7 67 reviews
30
Central · 5 zones · Est. 2006
27 0.9%
★ 3.0 4 reviews
31
Central · 4 zones
29 1.0%
★ 3.0 2 reviews
32
East · 3 zones · Est. 1982
26 0.9%
★ 3.8 26 reviews
33
16 0.5%
★ 4.3 174 reviews
34
East · 4 zones · Est. 2016
19 0.6%
★ 4.6 10 reviews
35
29 1.0%
★ 1.0 1 reviews
36
13 0.4%
★ 4.3 174 reviews
37
East · 3 zones · Est. 2019
25 0.9%
38
21 0.7%
★ 1.0 1 reviews
39
East · 3 zones · Est. 1996
18 0.6%
★ 1.0 5 reviews
40
21 0.7%
★ 2.0 1 reviews
41
Central · 5 zones · Est. 1984
19 0.6%
42
9 0.3%
★ 4.8 189 reviews
43
13 0.4%
★ 4.6 43 reviews
44
East · 3 zones · Est. 1999
18 0.6%
45
West · 4 zones · Est. 1986
15 0.5%
★ 2.3 51 reviews
46
16 0.5%
★ 3.0 6 reviews
47
Central · 3 zones · Est. 2019
15 0.5%
★ 3.0 27 reviews
48
East · 3 zones
18 0.6%
★ 1.4 9 reviews
49
East · 3 zones · Est. 2016
16 0.5%
50
East · 3 zones · Est. 1987
10 0.3%
★ 4.0 57 reviews
51
Central · 4 zones · Est. 2006
17 0.6%
52
Central · 3 zones
11 0.4%
★ 4.7 15 reviews
53
Central · 5 zones · Est. 1996
14 0.5%
★ 3.7 6 reviews
54
East · 5 zones · Est. 1999
19 0.6%
55
Central · 2 zones · Est. 1975
13 0.4%
★ 3.9 7 reviews
56
12 0.4%
★ 4.0 4 reviews
57
Central · 3 zones
16 0.5%
58
East · 4 zones · Est. 2022
14 0.5%
59
Central · 3 zones
10 0.3%
★ 4.7 9 reviews
60
14 0.5%
★ 1.0 2 reviews
61
Central · 4 zones
15 0.5%
62
16 0.5%
★ 3.3 3 reviews
63
Central · 4 zones · Est. 2020
8 0.3%
64
9 0.3%
★ 4.3 17 reviews
65
10 0.3%
★ 5.0 1 reviews
66
Central · 4 zones · Est. 2015
14 0.5%
67
Central · 3 zones · Est. 1998
13 0.4%
68
Central · 5 zones
10 0.3%
★ 2.2 27 reviews
69
East · 2 zones · Est. 1983
8 0.3%
70
North-East · 3 zones · Est. 1982
8 0.3%
71
8 0.3%
72
Central · 2 zones · Est. 2015
8 0.3%
73
9 0.3%
★ 3.3 6 reviews
74
Central · 4 zones
13 0.4%
75
Central · 4 zones · Est. 2011
10 0.3%
76
Central · 3 zones · Est. 1992
7 0.2%
77
East · 3 zones · Est. 2016
7 0.2%
78
East · 4 zones · Est. 1988
7 0.2%
79
East · 4 zones · Est. 2006
7 0.2%
80
9 0.3%
81
Central · 2 zones · Est. 1987
6 0.2%
82
Central · 2 zones · Est. 2014
6 0.2%
83
Central · 2 zones · Est. 2000
5 0.2%
★ 2.1 61 reviews
84
10 0.3%
85
Central · 4 zones · Est. 1996
9 0.3%
86
East · 4 zones · Est. 2022
8 0.3%
87
Central · 2 zones · Est. 2019
8 0.3%
88
Central · 3 zones · Est. 2017
5 0.2%
89
North-East · 4 zones · Est. 2020
5 0.2%
90
East · 5 zones · Est. 2019
8 0.3%
91
7 0.2%
92
9 0.3%
93
East · 3 zones · Est. 2018
7 0.2%
94
Central · 2 zones · Est. 2009
6 0.2%
95
Central · 3 zones · Est. 2019
6 0.2%
96
East · 3 zones · Est. 1979
5 0.2%
98
7 0.2%
99
Central · 4 zones
5 0.2%
100
5 0.2%
104
4 0.1%
105
East · 2 zones
4 0.1%
107
4 0.1%
108
4 0.1%
111
4 0.1%
114
East · 2 zones
3 0.1%
116
3 0.1%
117
3 0.1%
119
3 0.1%
121
3 0.1%
122
3 0.1%
124
Unknown · 2 zones
3 0.1%
125
Central · 2 zones
2 0.1%
126
2 0.1%
127
East · 2 zones
2 0.1%
128
2 0.1%
131
East · 2 zones
2 0.1%
132
Central · 2 zones
2 0.1%
133
2 0.1%
135
2 0.1%
138
Central · 2 zones
2 0.1%
140
2 0.1%
145
2 0.1%
148
2 0.1%

Data from the BCA MCST Register. Google ratings matched to Business Profiles. Updated 2026-08-07.

Managing agents in Singapore are appointed by the Management Corporation Strata Title (MCST) council to administer common property under the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act (BMSMA). Their statutory duties include maintaining and repairing common areas, collecting maintenance fees and sinking fund contributions, convening the Annual General Meeting (AGM), keeping proper accounts, and pursuing arrears from defaulting subsidiary proprietors. The sinking fund — which must amount to at least 10% of the annual budget under the BMSMA — is held separately from the management fund and must be managed with care; a well-run sinking fund protects your development from emergency special levies when lifts, roofs, or façades eventually require replacement. All managing agents operating in Singapore must be registered with the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) under the BMSMA, and councils should verify registration before engaging any firm.

When evaluating a managing agent, start by confirming BCA registration and checking whether the firm or its key personnel hold accreditations from recognised professional bodies such as the Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers (SISV) or the Association of Property and Facility Managers (APFM). Beyond credentials, assess their portfolio: a firm managing developments of a similar age, size, and complexity to yours will be better placed to anticipate your maintenance cycles and fee benchmarks. Request a breakdown of their fee structure — including whether routine maintenance, contractor procurement, and arrears recovery are bundled or billed separately — and ask for references from incumbent councils. Responsiveness is often the deciding factor; ask how defect reports are logged, what the SLA for follow-up is, and who your dedicated estate manager will be.

Switching managing agents is a straightforward process that does not require a general meeting of all subsidiary proprietors in most cases. The council passes a resolution by simple majority to terminate the existing management agreement in accordance with its terms, then serves the contractual notice period — typically three months. Upon expiry, the outgoing agent is legally obliged to hand over all records, keys, contracts, financial accounts, and the full balances of the management fund and sinking fund to the incoming agent or the MCST. Councils should appoint the incoming agent before the notice period expires to allow a parallel handover period. For guidance on the statutory framework, the BCA's Building Maintenance and Strata Management portal sets out the obligations of both councils and managing agents under the BMSMA.

Managing agents in Singapore — FAQs

What is the difference between a managing agent and a management council?
The management council (MC) is the elected body of owners that governs the MCST — it sets policy, approves budgets and makes decisions. The managing agent is a professional firm appointed by the MC to handle day-to-day operations: maintenance coordination, arrears recovery, AGM administration, sinking fund management and BMSMA compliance. Legal accountability remains with the MC; the agent is its operational contractor.
How are managing agent rankings calculated on this site?
The default sort combines: BCA portfolio size (primary signal), Google rating quality and review volume, presence of a verified website and phone number, and SISV/APFM accreditation. No firm can pay to improve its ranking. The sort is fully transparent and the underlying data is sourced from the BCA MCST register and Google Business Profiles.
How often is this data updated?
BCA portfolio data, Google ratings and firm website enrichment are updated periodically. The page footer shows the most recent update date. For the most current MCST assignment data, refer to the BCA MCST register directly.
Can a managing agent pay to appear higher in this directory?
No. Rankings are based entirely on objective, third-party data: BCA portfolio size and Google ratings. No firm can purchase a higher ranking, a badge, or featured placement. This independence is fundamental to how this directory works.
What is Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3?
Tier 1 firms manage 50 or more MCSTs nationally. Tier 2 firms manage 20–49 MCSTs. Tier 3 firms manage fewer than 20 MCSTs. Tier does not equate to quality; some of the highest-rated firms are Tier 2 or Tier 3.